Left to right: Blake, Helen, Eva |
Blake |
Helen |
Eva |
I've tried three of the five shades - Eva, which is a peachy mid pink which looks pretty good on my cool toned skin, but is designed to make warm toned skin look brighter; Helen, a super-sheer opalescent pink for a barely there pink effect; and Blake, a bright, orange toned pink for a pop of colour. All three are nice enough, and I find myself most drawn to Eva, which is odd given that it's meant for warmer skin tones; Helen, I think, is more obviously meant for my colouring, but I find it a little too subtle, verging on insipid.
The lipsticks themselves are lovely - a little waxy and cold on the lip initially, they soon warm up and glide onto the lip with a little resistance, imparting medium pigmentation as they go. The colour is buildable, and the formula light and hydrating enough to look and feel good for a few hours before they become too dry.
At £6.99, these lipsticks are reasonably priced and offer a quick way to choose a new pink - but they're not quite as revolutionary as I found the nude range. Find them now at Boots.
Disclosure: PR samples
This post originated at www.londonbeautyreview.com. If you're reading it elsewhere, it's been stolen, violating my copyright.
I had the same experience with the nudes collection- theoretically I would have looked best in Julianne Moore's nude (I am very fair with pink undertones) but I found that the one that suited me best was the Jennifer Lopez nude. I am excited for the pinks!
ReplyDelete