A short while after starting my new job about six months ago, I wandered down the Kings Road one lunch time, only to find a Kiehl's shop. The lady in there took me round, showing me gorgeous products, and finished off by giving me a hand massage (free of charge). So, you know, I felt compelled to buy something - and given my never ending obsession with silicone free conditioners, I ended up walking out with a tube of the Sunflower Colour Preserving Conditioner.
Not only is it free from silicone, it's also free from sulfates and parabens. This virtuous conditioner contains apricot kernel oil and sunflower oil, and claims to "protect colour-treated hair from becoming dry and dull". If you go back and read that sentence again, maybe you'll agree that the name of the conditioner - which puts the emphasis on preservation - doesn't really match up with the description, which talks about dryness and dullness. Still, this doesn't really bother me, as I don't really believe that conditioners can help preserve colour all that much - in my mind, it's the shampoo that contributes to fading.
Anyway - the absolute best thing about this product is the scent. Despite being named for the sunflower oil, it smells gloriously, intensely, freshly of apricots, in a way that takes me back to being a teenager, purchasing Aapri cleanser (which I thought was so expensive at around £4) and using it oh-so-slowly, whilst luxuriating in the scent. It's a good thing that the instructions for this state that it should be left on the hair for a few minutes, as I very much enjoy relaxing for a short while, just inhaling the scent. It lasts for around an hour after rinsing, and while it's a shame that it doesn't last longer, I suspect it would interfere with fragrance if it did.
The texture is thick, rich and creamy, and despite the lack of silicone, it does have a decent amount of slip, distributing through the hair easily. After rinsing, my hair always feels soft, and thanks to the thickness of the product it clings to the hair well enough to help with stubborn tangles.
I've also found that a teeny tiny dab of this conditioner is effective as a leave in conditioner; despite the richness, it's pretty light in texture, and a drop or two doesn't overload the hair so long as it's kept close to the ends. Added bonus is that the sumptuous fragrance sticks around a little longer, too.
Overall - I love this conditioner. However, at a whopping £18 for 200ml, this isn't the kind of conditioner most people can afford to use on a regular basis. For a special treat, though, it's gorgeous - mostly because of the scent.
If you'd like to try Kiehl's Sunflower Colour Preserving Conditioner for yourself, you'll find it in Kiehl's stores, department store counters, or online, where it will cost £18 for 200ml.
What do you think? Would you buy a conditioner (or any product bar perfume!) purely for the scent?
Find posts
anti-aging
bargains
basics
bath
bath oil
BB cream
blogging
blush
body
bronzer
brows
cc cream
charity
christmas
cleansers
coloured hair
competition
complaints
concealer
conditioner
curly hair
demonstration
diy
dry shampoo
duochrome
dupe
EOTD
events
eyeliner
eyes
eyeshadow
facial
facial oil
feet
FOTD
foundation
fragrance
gadgets
gifts
giveaway
glitter
guest review
hair
hair colour
hair removal
hair styling
hair treatments
hands
haul
highlighters
holographic
how to
lashes
lemmings
limited edition
lips
lipstick
liquid liner
london
lovely things
makeovers
makeup bags
makeup brushes
makeup remover
MAN REVIEW
manicure
mascara
masks
massage
moisturiser
multi-use
mum review
nail art
nails
offer
offers
opinion
palettes
rant
rants
review
sale
salon
scrubs
shaving
silicone free
spa
storage
styling tools
summer
sun
swatches
tanning
travel
unusual
Friday, 3 December 2010
Review: Kiehl's Sunflower Colour Preserving Conditioner
Labels:
coloured hair,
conditioner,
kiehl's,
review,
silicone free
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
►
2013
(120)
- May 2013 (24)
- April 2013 (20)
- March 2013 (26)
- February 2013 (24)
- January 2013 (26)
-
►
2012
(312)
- December 2012 (22)
- November 2012 (24)
- October 2012 (26)
- September 2012 (25)
- August 2012 (22)
- July 2012 (29)
- June 2012 (23)
- May 2012 (28)
- April 2012 (29)
- March 2012 (30)
- February 2012 (24)
- January 2012 (30)
-
►
2011
(376)
- December 2011 (30)
- November 2011 (30)
- October 2011 (27)
- September 2011 (33)
- August 2011 (28)
- July 2011 (31)
- June 2011 (30)
- May 2011 (31)
- April 2011 (32)
- March 2011 (37)
- February 2011 (29)
- January 2011 (38)
-
▼
2010
(488)
- December 2010 (29)
- November 2010 (35)
- October 2010 (43)
- September 2010 (39)
- August 2010 (44)
- July 2010 (37)
- June 2010 (39)
- May 2010 (39)
- April 2010 (41)
- March 2010 (42)
- February 2010 (53)
- January 2010 (47)
-
►
2009
(118)
- December 2009 (37)
- November 2009 (50)
- October 2009 (31)


No comments:
Post a Comment